94
Cloud data platform implementation and support
TED · France · €180K–€240K
- Category fit
- Country fit
Loading TenderVerity…
Loading TenderVerity…
Public procurement intelligence
Public technology tenders, normalized from official sources, scored against your capabilities, and explained line by line—so your team can focus on the bids worth pursuing.
Today's ranked opportunities
MatchesTED · France · €180K–€240K
TED · Belgium · Deadline in 24 days
TED · Netherlands · 3 matching CPV categories
Live capability preview
Turn your public website into a preliminary procurement profile, then inspect live official notices with visible capability-overlap evidence.
Official public sources
Normalized behind one schema
Point explainable score
Components, caps, and penalties
Scraped sources
Public APIs and official feeds only
The real cost
Alert portals move the pile into your inbox. The expensive work still starts afterward: reading, validating, comparing, and recording why an opportunity deserves attention.
Keyword alerts surface volume, but they do not tell your team what fits or why.
A relevance number without visible arithmetic cannot be trusted, tuned, or defended.
When reasoning lives in inboxes and chat threads, the next pursuit starts without context.
One qualification workspace
Profile, evidence, and workflow stay connected through the full qualification cycle.
Step one
Define services, CPV codes and their descendants, countries, values, languages, certifications, and hard exclusions. Incoming notices are normalized and ranked against that profile.
Opportunities · 66 results
IllustrativeDeadline extended—9 days added
Submission moved to 2 Sep 2026, 12:00 CEST. Two annexes were replaced.
Cloud data platform implementation and support
Pursuing · official source linked
Cybersecurity monitoring and incident response
Reviewing · official source linked
Construction of a municipal sports hall
Excluded · outside your CPV families
Step two
Every result stores its scoring version, component values, maximums, penalties, and the evidence that produced the result. The arithmetic reconciles on screen.
Profile fit
scoring-v2.6 · illustrative evaluation
CPV evidence
72315000 → 72315000Exact · Lot 1
72700000 → 72212460Related code
Step three
Assign an owner, move the opportunity through the pipeline, capture a structured reason, and retain the score version used when the decision was made.
Stage 1
Reviewing
Stage 2
Pursuing
Stage 3
Submitted
Stage 4
Outcome
Reviewing → Pursuing
Score at decision 86 · scoring-v2.6Sofia Lenoir · 29 Jul 2026, 11:20
Marc commented on the survey window
29 Jul 2026, 09:41
Coverage you can verify
The first release focuses on technology procurement—software, cloud, data, AI, cybersecurity, managed IT, networks, and related CPV families—across European and World Bank notices.
Country and language availability follows the source notice. Scores are qualification aids, not legal or procurement advice. Always verify deadlines, eligibility, documents, lots, and amendments on the linked official notice. Review source attribution.
Product principles
Qualification comes first. Your team owns the compliant narrative and submission.
What we do instead: We get the right opportunities in front of the people who can evaluate them.
A confident percentage without sufficient public evidence would be false precision.
What we do instead: We expose buyer history, prior awards, source evidence, and sample size.
The buyer portal remains authoritative for scope, dates, documents, and submission.
What we do instead: We preserve source attribution, content versions, and detected changes.
The opportunity digest
Score, buyer, deadline, and matching reasons give your team enough context to decide what deserves review—without hiding the official source.
Explore the sample digestTenderVerity digest
Fictional example—not live procurement data. A real digest links each result to its official source.
TED · France · €180K–€240K
TED · Belgium · Deadline in 24 days
Assisted pilot
We are onboarding a small group of bid teams, building each company profile together, and reviewing match quality line by line. No public pricing is shown during the pilot; customer feedback will help shape the release packaging.
Straight answers